|
|
EDU
5357: Critical Issues in the Teaching of Mathematics, Science, and Technology
Course description:
This course examines theoretical perspectives associated with a range
of issues related to teaching and learning mathematics, science, and technology.
Such issues include: the nature of mathematical, scientific and technological
knowledge; definitions of literacy in these areas; use of technology in
teaching; classroom and large-scale assessment; modes of inquiry; issues
of equity; and other challenges to these disciplines.
Given the
importance placed on mathematics, science, and technology in our society,
leaders and researchers in the educational community need to be aware
of these issues and to be familiar with relevant research. This course
examines these issues and key questions from a theoretical perspective,
through an examination of the emerging literature, as well as the perspective
of the practice of teaching and learning mathematics, science, and technology.
Participants in the course have the opportunity to collectively examine
the broad range of issues and also have the opportunity to focus on one
area of study that is of particular interest to them and to their practice.
Resources:
- Apple, M.W. (1992).
Do the standards go far enough? Power, policy, and practice in mathematics
education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23,
412-431.
- Borasi, R. (1994).
Learning mathematics through inquiry. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
- Bishop, A.J. (1990).
Mathematical power to the people. Harvard Educational Review, 60(3),
357-369.
- Bracey, G.W. (2000).
The TIMSS ‘final year’ study and report: A Critique. Educational
Researcher, 29(4), 4-10.
- Clements, D.H.,
& Battista, M.T. (1990). Constructivist learning and teaching. The
Arithmetic Teacher, 38(1), 34-37.
- Collins, H., &
Pinch, T. (1998). The golem at large: What you should know about
technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Cooper, D.A. (1999).
Navigating the thorny path: A colloquial definition of mathematics literacy
with connections to various school mathematics standards. In K. Comfort
(Ed.), Advancing standards for science and mathematics education:
Views from the field. Washington, DC: American Association for
the Advancement of Science.
- Davis, B. (1997).
Listening for differences: An evolving conception of mathematics teaching.
Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(3), 355-376.
- Davis, B. (1996).
Teaching mathematics: Toward a sound alternative. New York:
Garland.
- Davis, R., Maher,
C., & Noddings, N. (Eds.). (1990). Constructivist views on the teaching
and learning of mathematics [Special issue]. Journal for Research
in Mathematics Education. (Monograph No. 4)
- Ernest, P. (1991).
The philosophy of mathematics education. London, UK: Falmer
Press.
- Fey, J.T. &
Hirsch, C.R. (1992). Calculators in mathematics education.
Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM).
- Gregory, J. &
Miller, S. (1998). Science in public: Communication, culture, and
credibility. New York: Plenum Trade.
- Harding, S. (1991).
Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women’s lives.
Milton Keynes Open University Press.
- Heid, M. et al.
(1993). Computing technology. In P.S. Wilson (Ed.). Research ideas
for the classroom: High school mathematics. New York: Macmillan
Publishing. 198-214.
- Irwin, A., &
Wynne, B. (Eds.) (1996). Misunderstanding science: the public reconstruction
of science and technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Kaput, J. (1992).
Technology and mathematics education. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook
of research on mathematics teaching and learning. NY: Macmillan
Publishing. 515-557.
- Kulm, G. (Ed.).
(1990). Assessing higher order thinking in mathematics. Washington,DC:
American Association for the Advancement of Science.
- Layton, D., Jenkins,
E., Macgill, S., & Davey, A. (1993). Inarticulate science? Perspectives
on the public understanding of science and some implications for science
education. Nafferton: Studies in Education Ltd.
- Levinson, R.,
and Thomas, J., (Eds.). (1997). Science today: problem or crisis?
London: Routledge.
- Lubienski, S.T.
(2000). Problem solving as a means toward mathematics for all: An exploratory
look through a class lens. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,
31(4). 454-482.
- Ma, Liping. (1999).
Knowing and teaching elementary school mathematics. Mahwah,
NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Morgan, C. (1998).
Writing mathematically: The discourse of “investigation”.
Bristol, PA: Falmer Press.
- National Research
Council. (1989). Everybody counts: A report to the nation on the
future of mathematics education. Washington, DC: National Academy
Press.
- National Council
of Teachers of Mathematics. (1995). Assessment standards for school
mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
- National Council
of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for
school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
- Paulos, J.A. (1988).
Innumeracy: Mathematical illiteracy and its consequences. New
York: Hill & Wang.
- Rogers, P., &
Kaiser, G. (Eds.) (1995). Equity in mathematics education: Influences
of feminism and culture. London: Falmer Press.
- Romberg, T.A.
(Ed.). (1995). Reform in school mathematics and authentic assessment.
Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
- Secada, W.G. (Ed.).
(2000). Changing the faces of mathematics: Perspectives on multiculturalism
and gender equity. Reston, VA: NCTM
- Seeger, F., Voigt,
J., & Waschescio (Eds.). (1998). The culture of the mathematics
classroom. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Sfard, A. (2001).
There is more to discourse than meets the ears: Looking at thinking
as communicating to learn more about mathematical learning. Educational
Studies in Mathematics, 46, 13-57.
- Shamos, M. (1999).
The myth of scientific literacy. New Jersey: Rutgers University
Press.
- Slavin, R. E.
(1990). Achievement effects of ability grouping in secondary schools:
A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 60,
471-499.
- Sowder, J.T.(Ed.).
(1997). Equity, mathematics reform, and research: Crossing boundaries
in search of understanding (Special issue). Journal for Research
in Mathematics Education, 28(6).
- Spurgeon, D. (1990)
Communicating science: why and how: Second conference on the public
awareness of science in Canada. Ottawa: The Royal Society of Canada
– Committee on the Public Awareness of Science.
- Tobias, S. (1994).
Overcoming math anxiety. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
- Wiggins, G. (1989).
A true test: Toward more authentic and equitable assessment. Phi
Delta Kappan. May.
- Wiggins, G. (1999).
Assessing student performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
|